🔗 Share this article

During last year's presidential campaign, Donald Trump courted voters with promises to reduce costs starting on day one. But, after his inauguration, he seemed to pay minimal attention to affordability issues. This shifted after inflation-weary voters expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Within days, the Trump administration launched a hastily assembled effort to tackle living costs. Regrettably, this initiative is a disorganized endeavor—characterized by absurdity, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Claims and Supermarket Truth

Just two days post-election, the president began his cost-reduction push with a poorly received remark: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” This comment from billionaire Trump—often associates with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go the grocery store. In effect, he dismissed their struggles as trivial, implying they were mistaken about price levels.

His assertion that everything was “way down” proved absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. In what way could all costs be falling when his cherished tariffs were pushing up prices? Recent data indicate the cost of bananas rose 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped 18.9%—partly because of import taxes applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, costs increased in the majority of main grocery groups tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including animal proteins (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (rising slightly).

Contradictions and Inaccuracies in Economic Statements

In spite of these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his misleading narrative about lower costs. Since election day, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements ignore the fact that general costs have unarguably risen since Biden left office. At present, price growth is at a 3 percent per year, which is 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that fuel costs had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data show they average $3.19.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, advisers apparently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message made him sound dangerously out of touch from typical Americans. Many voters are frustrated about rising costs following promises of reductions. In response, aides suggested a simple solution: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes would not increase costs for US consumers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Possible Impact

As certain taxes being rolled back on several food items, Trump will probably claim that he has lowered costs once those foods start declining in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for putting out a fire that he had started. On another occasion, when addressing fast-food leaders, Trump stated that “we are in the golden age of America” and told the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to countless households facing hardships—especially when many risk cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a recent poll from October, 74% of Americans think economic conditions are fair or poor, while only 26% rate them positive. Another poll showed that 61% of Americans feel Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Reality and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, the president’s top economic official, recently disputed claims of a prosperous era. He noted that instead of thriving, some parts of the American economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and lost around tens of thousands of positions this year. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary called on the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

In response to widespread concern about living costs, Trump proposed a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “high income people.” For many households in need, it seems like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. This idea would likely increase federal spending, push up borrowing costs, and possibly fuel inflation by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

Another proposed solution for cost issues involved introducing 50-year mortgages, with the notion that they could lower housing costs. However, the truth is that 50-year mortgages would do little to reduce installments—frequently reducing them by just $100 or $200 per month. The downside is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost borrowers pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Economic Outlook

In their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have once more blamed the previous president for economic problems, including rising prices. Spokespeople stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are unfounded and inaccurate claims. Actually, Biden handed over a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. But, the current administration’s actions—especially his tariffs—have resulted in an difficult situation, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

According to an economist, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He fears that if large states like California and New York tumble into recession, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. During recessions, consumers generally possess reduced funds to spend, and price increases often falls. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted affordability campaign likely to do little to hold down prices, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that struggling Americans cannot handle.